Much though it pains me to admit it, there is some foundation to the remarks made by Michael Gove yesterday (in
The Daily Mail, to which I shall not link). The view of the Western Front presented in
Blackadder Goes Forth does indeed include a number of inaccurate myths. In particular the view presented of the general staff, insane and with little feeling for the soldiers they sent to the slaughter, is unfair on the real Captain Darlings and General Melchetts. Staff officers often worked themselves into a state of nervous exhaustion, and many tried to get posted back to the front, feeling that this was the proper place for them. Fifty-eight generals were killed as a result of combat (Richard Holmes,
The Western Front, pp. 117-18).
Nor is it the case that everyone saw the war as futile and pointless, either in 1918 or now. As Hew Strachan notes (
The First World War, p. 321), it wasn't seen as pointless in Belgium in 1918.
Where Gove is wrong is in his politicization of the debate, in his lack of respect for those who disagree with him, in his promotion of an equally simplistic view of the war as a heroic struggle, in his support of the government's plans to commemorate the First World War, which are dangerously close to celebration, and in his linkage of all this to his educational "reforms", which seem intended to prepare young people for a world of imperial heroics, a world that no longer exists.